"Anyone have children that got autism and they were vaccinated or any mom's have kids that have autistic children and never got the vaccines"
Sure, there are lot of unvaccinated autistic people and lots of vaccinated autistic people. Obviously, there will be more vaccinated autistics, as there are greater numbers of vaccinated individuals than not; however the rate of autism is the same in both groups. This is actually evidence that vaccines aren't the cause.
People who oppose vaccination will say that it just means vaccines can trigger autism, that there are many causes. Of course, they have no proof that this is the case, it's just special pleading on their part.
You should be confident that vaccines will not give your children autism - the vast majority of the scientific community is, after extensive investigation. Not to mention, the only paper suggesting this has been through the wringer and exposed as fraud. Vaccines are very safe and much more preferable than the diseases they prevent.
Edit: To be blunt, Holly is a liar. The MMR is near 100% effective and the risk of serious harm is incredibly low. No one on here is financially motivated to answer in favor of vaccination. She can't refute anything we say, so she lies to try and discredit our position.
Edit: @Multiple Miracles: The rate of autism across the world pretty well rules out the cause being the American diet; as does the fact that children are barely into solids when they first show signs.
Edit: "Nate I hope you are aware that you and your cronies are blatantly lying every time you call me a liar. The very fact you all feel the need to call me out almost every time only shows you feel threatened by my answers. I am here to make sure that everyone asking vaccine related questions can hear both sides of the vaccine debate rather than being bombarded by all of you self-righteous *Pharma bloggers with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. It is ultimately up to them to decide whose advice to take."
Lets see, you call me and other users pharma bloggers, financially motivated to answer in the pro-vaccine camp. I know, and they know this isn't the case. How? Well, I'm me, aren't I? You've been told this over and over, but continue to lie. You have no evidence, only your post-hoc definition, designed to pigeonhole anyone with a dissenting opinion into a shill.
If you were really interested in letting people decide for themselves, you wouldn't be poisoning the well, lying in an attempt to make our position seem weaker. Of course, even if someone is financially motivated, it doesn't make them a liar.
Edit: Best to lock him in a freezer; so he can cool off :)
Edit: "If vaccines were really safe the NVICP (National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) wouldn't exist. It has paid out over a billion dollars in compensation so far to parents of children injured or killed by vaccines."
There have been about 2700 compensated cases in 23 years of the program. The burden of proof is so low, you can't even claim all of those as vaccine injuries. Considering that, and the tens of millions who were vaccinated in that time frame, we're not speaking out of turn when we say vaccines are very safe.