Question:
Do you agree that for all her flaws, Hillary still would have been a far better president than Trump?
2017-05-26 16:06:04 UTC
Do you agree that for all her flaws, Hillary still would have been a far better president than Trump?
157 answers:
?
2017-05-28 11:30:58 UTC
I dunno but I doubt Mrs Clinton is NOT going to run for President again, so the Dems will need to nominate somebody else to take on the Trumpeter in 2020.
j
2017-05-28 00:17:23 UTC
Now look 99% of politicians blatantly lie to the public to get elected but Hillary has lied and then turned tail and support the very thing she doesn't stand for earlier. In fact I think the only loyalty she has is with power and if the nazis were rising in power and were popular she would join them. And my family has an old moral that of someone promises you something then backs out or lies you are dead to us there is almost no bond as strong as an agreement to me.
?
2017-05-27 21:26:59 UTC
You want to replace Trump with a thief and liar?!
?
2017-05-27 20:13:02 UTC
Me for president
Eric
2017-05-27 16:56:37 UTC
NO MEANS NO!
Richard
2017-05-27 16:44:27 UTC
Hillary is probably just your typical run of the mill politician. Feed us lies to get elected then open our eyes to how we've been duped.



Trump, on the other hand, continues the charade even though the election is over. But then again, he'll NEVER have the luxury of telling the truth and moving on! His lies are burying him and if he dare speak the truth he's done.



And yet, with this hell that Trump inflicts on America I'm still convinced Hillary would have been worse.



She probably could have made a 4 year term easily and possibly get reelected. And then we would find out after the fact how horribly screwed we were! At least with Trump we KNOW how screwed up he is and hopefully won't make it one year in office.



Impeach now or America will suffer later!
2017-05-27 03:37:29 UTC
Far better? Hmm. I'm not sure.

Somewhat better? Yes.

She wasn't going to cut welfare programs and health care and social security. She wanted to fix and improve Obamacare, not just end it and replace it with something worse. She wanted to raise the minimum wage and provide paid family leave to Americans. She wanted to fix the sky high price of college.

I think if she won and democrats won that there would be progress and improvements for the middle class. But I still don't think she would've been as great as Bernie sanders.
Re Vera
2017-05-27 02:40:44 UTC
Better? Yes. Far better? Not sure. I think the biggest difference between Hillary and Trump would be that Hillary would at least be competent enough to conceal her corruption.
?
2017-05-27 02:12:04 UTC
no and he is no better I'm for neither one
2017-05-27 01:46:25 UTC
Good Lord, of course! Today, as we've all seen, evcen pee Wee Herman would have made a better Resident of the WH.
?
2017-05-30 08:45:54 UTC
Both are not good. But I bet Trump is much better than Hilary.
Joseph
2017-05-29 13:14:52 UTC
F*ck no. Let's get one little fact straight, the only person to blame for Hillary's loss is Hillary, Not Bernie, not Obama and certainly not Trump ( who was supposed to be the joke candidate ) Hillary is to Blame for Hillary's loss and no one else.NO ONE TRUSTED HER.
Askin Nakk Le Vaar
2017-05-28 17:51:29 UTC
No way man. She would have been way way worse as president.
Heath
2017-05-28 07:55:43 UTC
No. For all Trumps flaws (which he has many, I'm conservative, but not a blind Trump follower) I think he means well and will ultimately make the country more secure and economically sound. Mrs. Clinton, from what I've seen, is power hungry and will say whatever nessicary to win public approval and media applause. We've seen Trump affirm the first amendment (with the church executive order) and advocate the second amendment, as well as attempting to bring jobs back which, in time, will allow minority communities (especially black) to thrive. If we had Mrs. Clinton, we'd be discussing hate speech laws, even more domestic terrorism, 2nd amendment distortion, and the continued empty promises to out black and other minority countrymen and countrywomen.
Ali_Lynn1039
2017-05-27 23:38:27 UTC
She would have been better but what this country needs is Bernie Sanders.
2017-05-27 23:34:47 UTC
The American citizens didn't vote for Donald Trump.

They vote against Hillary.

Sort of 80 percent. But today appear different do to Traps on the ballots, right after the election day.

"I want a recount " She knew what She and her crew was doing.

I wouldn't ask for recount , what for?
2017-05-27 22:23:10 UTC
Nope. She'd be just as bad, but less flamboyant. Perhaps Bill would be the one mouthing off embarrassingly.
2017-05-27 21:05:05 UTC
Trump is the greatest President in American History!



Something had to be done about all those poor people in America.



Trump should establish work camps for them, emptying out the Urban ghettos in the process. Sound familiar?
Zack
2017-05-27 21:01:26 UTC
EVERYONE would be better than Trump.
Ploum
2017-05-27 19:48:25 UTC
"far better"?!



No ! Alas...
?
2017-05-27 17:43:06 UTC
I still like Trump. Cut social programs = more money in my pocket. Why should MY money be taken to pay for OTHER people's weakness?
Tootoy
2017-05-27 16:48:39 UTC
At the very least, she had some knowledge of government.

And she was well-known throughout the world as a First Lady, a senator and a Secretary of State.



Trump is known in parts of the world where he has business and is well-known for his strong arm tactics

in making deals.
2017-05-27 13:56:54 UTC
That's great material. Smart people would laugh.
2017-05-27 11:12:31 UTC
Hmmmm



So far your elected officials have broken the world peace and set off thousands of incidents, some of which you've felt in the United States.

This reflects only on the American people. And as a result the average American is no longer safe outwith their borders.



I'd like to go on holiday and not have to worry about being in someones vengence fantasy carried forth.



Trump isn't the usual pres that could continue attacking foreign nations on suspect reasons, if anything he'd likely want trade deals where everyone can make some CASHHHH.

He could rebuild the bridges previous presidents have smashed apart.



Oh and the assasinations need to stop.
shira
2017-05-27 06:21:24 UTC
**** No
2017-05-27 05:52:47 UTC
you mean far worse
?
2017-05-27 01:45:14 UTC
Of course. So would you or I. So would Casey Anthony.
justa
2017-05-26 16:34:28 UTC
Seems like a lot of those flaws were made up by Russian propaganda that gave the edge to Trump, who is embarrassing the country even as we speak. We though his tweets were bad? His behavior is worse, diplomacy isn't in his vocabulary.
liberalus_destructus
2017-05-26 16:18:08 UTC
No.
ndmagicman
2017-05-26 16:10:36 UTC
Without question.

Although that is setting the bar awfully low since Trump has been a complete and total disaster.
?
2017-05-30 10:00:30 UTC
Agree.
Harold
2017-05-29 20:47:07 UTC
Double her flaws and she is still better than trump
Q
2017-05-28 04:05:49 UTC
I respect your opinion, but it might get crazy.
Raymond L.
2017-05-27 23:24:24 UTC
Heck no! I couldn't type that fast Enough.
I was wrong once
2017-05-27 21:04:02 UTC
yeah of course. At least she can speak coherently and acts like an adult.
2017-05-27 19:49:30 UTC
Both are foolish. And Americans wonder why the world laughs at us. There are actually people that support these politicians.
2017-05-27 19:14:09 UTC
IF IT HADN'T BEEN FOR HER EXTREME GUN CONTROL AGENDA, SHE WOULD NOW BE THE FORTY FIFTH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. She, would not have gone swearing to leave Social Security and Medicaid alone and then go ruthlessly attacking both head on.
vulcan_alex
2017-05-27 18:47:28 UTC
She would just be a less fit version of Obama, no improvements, no change, nothing but crooked, incompetent, Hillary. She needs to retire to a home capable of keeping her out of trouble.
?
2017-05-27 17:15:43 UTC
Yes, but mainly because Trump sets such a low bar
?
2017-05-27 15:53:09 UTC
Yeah
?
2017-05-27 15:52:12 UTC
No, I do not agree that anyone with Hillary's record of incompetence, regardless of any good she had done, would have made her a good president, nope, not at all. The bad supersedes any good she ever did. Because when she made mistakes, horrible choices, they were really detrimental to this country. Hillary

has an agenda: she puts herself and her own interests first, not the American people's. Unfortunate, but true.
2017-05-27 14:08:07 UTC
No , She would make the Earth a burnt cinder in space out of revenge and WW3
2017-05-27 12:51:54 UTC
Not no Hell No . Filthy , Criminal C Hag .
2017-05-27 11:39:22 UTC
The day that one would support a Traitor to the people of this nation. Is

the day we stop being a country. Watch 13 hours. Then come back and

ask this question again.
2017-05-27 07:31:13 UTC
easy explanation Hilary would be like putting the fox in charge of the hen house
?
2017-05-27 06:19:39 UTC
No I do not think so
2017-05-27 06:17:14 UTC
Hillary is a woman. Women tend to be inferior.
?
2017-05-26 22:28:13 UTC
Absolutely not. She was simply going to be another Obama, not doing anything whatsoever for the American people and damn sure not doing anything for the people that get up and go to work every morning.
-j.
2017-05-26 16:19:05 UTC
Yes. So would an otter, a tree or a bowl of soup.
2017-05-26 16:07:25 UTC
My Jack Russell could have been a better POTUS v. Donald J. Trump.



Trump is turning out to just be an American embarrassment....



It's SO friggin' obvious......



And my Jack Russell is even older in Dog years.



too funny......
?
2017-05-29 08:35:58 UTC
no
2017-05-28 05:18:08 UTC
No - that's why she LOST!
2017-05-28 04:17:59 UTC
No
2017-05-28 01:28:57 UTC
df
2017-05-27 22:48:58 UTC
Hell no I don't agree. She is a mess!
2017-05-27 21:53:42 UTC
LO INFOers like you would
2017-05-27 21:23:59 UTC
no to hillary and trump. sanders for prez only. or sanders / johnson
mom
2017-05-27 20:45:26 UTC
I'm not aware of many faults except to not defend herself and tell the truth about the Republicans a little better. I don't think she fought back hard enough and I do believe the Republicans did a whole lot of lying and propaganda. Look at how they keep repeating things that have been found completely false. At this point I find Trump even more repulsive than I did Sanders the Independent.
2017-05-27 17:32:59 UTC
More Presidential. But she still had a lot of problems.
Anonymous
2017-05-27 17:10:30 UTC
Importing Muslims, Open Borders, more catering to Illegals...Hillary's style

Hillary would have sold us like Bill did with NAFTA down the econ river...



Trump stood tall and firm for his support of US Workers first at the G7!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4547434/Trump-charm-snarls-climate-change-migrants-trade.html
2017-05-27 16:40:34 UTC
Its the reason I voted for her is because she would have

AND what I was saying all along before the election was

Bill Clinton was a good president AND he's also very intelligent AND he knows how it all works in that place AND if she had become the president we wouldn't have had 1 president we would have gotten 2 for the price of one..........and that would have been great
?
2017-05-27 15:08:10 UTC
If Hillary the Cvnt won we would now have amnesty for all mexicans, Communist style gun control, and rapefugees being bussed into every White neighborhood in America...
?
2017-05-27 14:44:41 UTC
I do think Hillary would be a better president than Trump.
2017-05-27 13:53:31 UTC
No
Jerry S
2017-05-27 11:33:29 UTC
yes, without a doubt
?
2017-05-27 05:00:39 UTC
Hillary was & is a mad woman. NO
pit bulls bite
2017-05-26 16:36:53 UTC
she couldnt lead a memorial day parade
tigeress
2017-05-26 16:21:46 UTC
Oh, there is no doubt about that. Trump is the worse threat to the United States --much worse than any terrorist. Pense isn't much better.



Something is seriously wrong within our own government. Over seven of our closest and most trusted allies warned us several times, since 2015, about the Russian-Trump connection and their goal to rig the presidential election. They plan to place their puppet into power, create chaos and economic ruin.



Our FBI and CIA put party before country. Russia won the election. Look what horrible things the Republicans have done in just 100 days. Trump elected men to his cabinet who despise the government programs they now control.
Eric the Woodshed
2017-05-26 16:10:29 UTC
Hell yes. Even W was a better president than this dumpster fire.
2017-05-26 16:07:05 UTC
beyond any doubt https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/ce/28/95/ce2895c7be37a40974ecd16952247c76.jpg
bigsisterbee13
2017-05-29 01:29:38 UTC
Rather have a pervert over the murderer.
2017-05-28 16:23:54 UTC
She lost, there is no what if's anymore.
MICHEAL
2017-05-28 14:55:35 UTC
not a chance its kind of hard to run a country when your in jail
James
2017-05-27 23:34:52 UTC
No way Hoza .She has flaws galore , too many and also her uranium deal with the Russians and collusion with the press.
?
2017-05-27 23:14:41 UTC
The Arabs, Muslims would throw bombs all over her ! Meaning just play with her !
2017-05-27 20:02:09 UTC
No thanks.
2017-05-27 19:58:34 UTC
Nah I'd say the same
2017-05-27 18:28:45 UTC
Your answer to this depends on your ethnicity and class. If you're a well off white man or woman, you're loving it and your answer would be "hell no!". If you're a lower-middle class white man or woman and still like trump, you have yet to realize how badly you are about to be screwed! If you're any ethnicity other than white, you're answer to this question would be yes!
Wade
2017-05-27 16:51:06 UTC
I agree that she WOULD BE better for Russia or China, but NOT for the US! Lol!
?
2017-05-27 14:56:46 UTC
No trump is better, barely but better
2017-05-27 10:07:45 UTC
Yes. OJ Simpson and Charles Manson would make better presidents than Trump!
Weasel McWeasel
2017-05-27 07:50:23 UTC
No, it's not a matter of being "better".



I mean, sure, she would have acted more professional and more intelligent, and not make an complete A S S out of herself every 5 minutes, like Trump is doing..............oh, no question, she would have been better on that score..........



but with all HER crooked connections and shady "Clinton Foundation" dealings, and pay for play, all all the crap she was tied up in................I think the investigations would have been equally endless........



and would have sent contards into conniption fits...........so, NO, I don't think overall, there would have been any grand big difference.



I think it would have been the exact same corrupt as Sh*t shady goings on, had either of them won.......



which is precisely why I didn't vote for either of them, and voted for Joe Biden, as a protest vote.



Say what you want about Smoking Joe.......but no one has ever accused the man of Mob ties, or secret slush funds, or corruption. He's clean as a whistle, with 42 years of experience in Washington, and would have made a far better president than either of these two slick con artists.
?
2017-05-27 07:08:01 UTC
you must be insane.
busterwasmycat
2017-05-27 05:43:16 UTC
Pretty well anyone would be a better president than Agent Orange. I doubt I would have liked her as president, but she definitely would have done a better job.
2017-05-27 02:34:29 UTC
Yes
?
2017-05-27 02:16:50 UTC
Yeah
?
2017-05-27 01:48:11 UTC
Better than how Trumps doing
Amy
2017-05-26 19:32:24 UTC
Yes
xg6
2017-05-26 17:19:50 UTC
YES!
2017-05-26 16:42:12 UTC
No.
Jessica
2017-05-28 08:25:36 UTC
No hell no
2017-05-28 07:21:59 UTC
No. She doesn't smoke cigars
2017-05-28 02:48:38 UTC
NO, NO, NO !
?
2017-05-28 00:01:01 UTC
Well, let's see.. we have a career politician with experience in law, foreign policy, and the New York state senate and a reality TV star, business man, and successful investor. America's choice was to elect a man with ZERO political experience into the highest office in the world; the U.S. presidency. Of course the person with more experience would be better suited for the job. Conservative people won't admit this though; they'd rather have a belligerent, racist, idiot that thinks and talks just like them than someone who thinks liberally, and is for the rights of ALL PEOPLE.
Daniel
2017-05-27 23:26:39 UTC
Not sure it would have been much different. There's not as much different between them as people think.
2017-05-27 22:25:43 UTC
The people who voted for Trump didn't even like him, they just wanted to throw a firecracker in the machine
pepsiman
2017-05-27 21:32:30 UTC
Hands down, a better president.
?
2017-05-27 21:21:41 UTC
Nope. She would have been far far worse than Trump.



This is why I did not vote for any president.
Susan
2017-05-27 20:06:34 UTC
The best thing about the Trump presidency is that Hillary Clinton is not President!
Iamtryingtobuyahouse
2017-05-27 19:34:56 UTC
I'd say so
Daisy
2017-05-27 18:48:17 UTC
Yes, of course. She understood how Washington worked and got a long fairly well with other world leaders.

Trump and his cronies have proven time and again that they have no idea what's going on and now they're out to cut every decent social program just to build that stupid wall.
koalatcomics
2017-05-27 15:38:13 UTC
the families of vince foster ron brown the Benghazi four the fast and furious dead and billy dale and the five women ... that we know of ...bill Clinton raped while potus would say.... no.
Mrs McGee
2017-05-27 12:02:59 UTC
A stray cat covered in fleas would have been a far better President than Trump (or Clinton).
Williew
2017-05-27 12:01:12 UTC
Absolutley , Bernie too..............
Andy F
2017-05-27 11:18:42 UTC
Yes -- but in many ways, I still think she would have been very unsatisfactory. I voted for her and canvassed for her at the last minute, as "lesser evil" compared to Trump. But she was and is too close to the bankers, and her foreign policy record on supporting democracy in Honduras is very bad. Her judgment regarding 'regime change' in Libya was terrible, judging from the fact that it gave another toehold to ISIS.



i think she's very good on some important issues that should be supported by all Americans, including women's rights, equal rights for people of all races, and compassion toward immigrants and the children of immigrants. On the crucial issue of environmental protection and climate change, she's talking common sense, while Trump is talking idiotic garbage.



But in many ways she takes pro-corporate, anti-consumer, anti-labor, pro-war positions in private that people like me despise when Trump takes them publicly. I think if she were president, loyal Democratic liberals would be under pressure to support many lousy policies that everyone knows not to support when the Republicans promote them.



-- democratic socialist for bernie's principles
Annonymous
2017-05-27 04:40:04 UTC
Without question the better qualified candidate.
?
2017-05-26 18:17:08 UTC
No, I do not agree. As bad as Trump is, I wouldn't want unctuous Hillary to be in charge of the country. Bad things seem to happen to those around her.
David S
2017-05-26 17:03:31 UTC
Oh no. No, no, no. Not for a second.
?
2017-05-26 16:10:06 UTC
Yes, I do.
2017-05-26 16:09:12 UTC
Not at all. Hillary is such a horrid, corrupt and dishonest person she could never hope to be as good a president as Trump has been.



Her essential incompetence and greed guaranteed that if we'd had the misfortune of electing her, she would displace Obama as the worst president in history.
2017-05-31 01:34:21 UTC
Yes. She wouldn't do it "just off the top of her head."
old fart
2017-05-30 11:35:46 UTC
No way! I don't like Trump much but like Hillary much less,
?
2017-05-28 16:03:03 UTC
Yes
Jimbo
2017-05-28 13:22:18 UTC
Yes, absolutely. I'm sure our military would love dying in the line of duty and having her blame a video for it. And i KNOW Russia would love an idiot who gave them a cheap a$$ed reset button that meant something else entirely. And maybe she could sell the REST of our uranium supplies to them for ANOTHER donation to the Clinton slush fund.
?
2017-05-28 06:35:03 UTC
NO
Funny Mike
2017-05-28 06:23:11 UTC
Wikileaks showed clearly that she was involved in some big corruption scandals. How can a person be better for the post of president of the USA if she is not acting upon the will of the people but the will of somebody in the shadow.
ruth
2017-05-28 05:56:54 UTC
They're both equally awful and I wish neither of them were ever born. The end.
?
2017-05-28 00:10:56 UTC
no trump is life
2017-05-27 23:15:45 UTC
Nope.
2017-05-27 22:36:11 UTC
No. I say this because we would've gotten the social policy we wanted, but ultimately, that would've just been a bone she threw at the public to distract us from the fact she'd be making policy favoring her rich friends.
2017-05-27 21:52:57 UTC
She should be in prison, looking out.
?
2017-05-27 18:02:16 UTC
HELL yeah!
?
2017-05-27 16:57:43 UTC
Except for the democrats insane anti-firearm shtick she may have been president. Basically she was Bernie in a pants suit. On every issue except firearms she was miles ahead of any of the republicans on issues that count for the 95% of Americans who work for hourly wages. Let's be real, the GOP/Tea/Fox/Koch/Jesus freak party isn't the slightly right of center Eisenhower republican party. The party of No got a real loser elected and we'll all have to live with it. Hopefully next time both parties will put up reasonable folks....let us pray!
Armchair Goddess #1
2017-05-27 13:06:18 UTC
To all of you who have answered this question with "no"...I urge you to go back and review a few things in order to change your mind and be on the correct side of history. We now know that what "justagrandma" has said in her response is true---there have been at least 200 Russian BOTS generating false information about Hillary, but there has also been a 25-year effort by the white-men-controlled GOP to discredit both Bill and Hillary Clinton. In the run-up to the election, however, the GOP and Russia both used propaganda-laden accelerated series of attacks focused especially on Hillary.



Did any of you know that Hillary was going to appoint billionaire Mark Cuban to Labor Secretary? Cuban gives each of his employees PROFIT-SHARING, and this was part of Hillary's proposal to give more security to America's workers. In fact, Hillary had a plan to shift CEOs' focus away from pleasing their investors by keeping workers' wages and benefits low to "expand profit margins" and instead invest more in the workers whose labors created the PROFITS that these corporate greedy-guts then snatch up in multi-million "salaries" (corporate raiding) for themselves, with not much left over for the profits-creating workers. Hillary had a plan to reduce the huge gap between corporate bosses' and workers' salaries so that workers would ultimately have more spending money each payday---all part of the budget-balancing, economy-growing, deficit-ending fiscal policies proposed by Hillary's budget-balancing, surplus-building ($362 BILLION) former-President husband Bill Clinton. EXPERIENCE would have been what we got as Americans if the rigging by Russia to elect a corrupt, lifts-wearing, incompetent, inane, dangerously unstable, malleable nincompoop Trump.



Look up Hillary's impressive biography at National First Ladies Library or on Wikipedia. Since graduating from Wellesley as their very first Valedictorian with a major in Political Science, Hillary has been a powerful force for positive changes---her graduation speech was so timely and intense that she was featured on the cover of a prestigious magazine. Yes, Hillary was a moderate Republican throughout her youthful years, as was her dad, but she switched to the Democratic party just before attending Yale Law School, in part to protest the Vietnam War, but also to advocate for the poor, the abuse, the discriminated against, the downtrodden. Hillary has devoted much of her public service to helping children and families---and we would have been greatly served had she been sent to the White House. She WON that election! I mourn our loss of this most qualified candidate ever to run for our Presidency.
2017-05-27 11:32:25 UTC
I vote for guns
Dr. Jeff
2017-05-26 17:55:47 UTC
Of course. That is a given.
penn
2017-05-26 16:32:29 UTC
Its difficult to say. They have completely different agendas, so its not completely fair to assume. However, as far as efficiency is concerned, Hillary would be working under MUCH less duress from external forces such as the news media. Furthermore, as detested as she is amongst conservatives, I feel that she would encounter more bipartisan agreement and fairness than Trump. So would she be better? who knows? maybe, maybe not. However, it is permissible to say that as difficult as being president is, Donald Trump is working under much more tumultuous conditions than Hillary would have been. The man is constantly being attacked by the media, democrats, and moderate republicans, the likes of which have never been seen before.
moondog
2017-05-26 16:25:43 UTC
no her position on the oil and gas coal industry was DISASTEROUS of working men and women, her view on ISRAEL is unforgiveable and her position on white men ergo white people is suicidal.
not
2017-05-26 16:22:24 UTC
Not a chance. Her support is people blind to her whole career. She is not the person she groomed herself to be for her 2016 election introduction. This is classic manipulation. She is the elitist hater that liberals despise. Hillary fought against gay rights until she lost to Obama 8 years ago and realized she needed to find more support. All of a sudden a change of heart. Check her anti gay voice out right here of youtube: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fZkK2_6H9MM



Study her more and you will see a pattern of this. One of her graduation speeches is on you tube. She rants about power. You think about that...do you want a leader that rants about power or one that talks about what they can do for their people? Nobody that seeks power should be given power.
?
2017-05-26 16:09:00 UTC
I've got toe jam that's more sentient than Trump.
Andrew
2017-05-30 02:28:48 UTC
Hell no drive across America there are towns that are completely hollowed out . Crooked Hillary is a globalist she does not care if the only factory that exist in a small town packs up and goes to Mexico has long has she pockets money from special interest groups . Trump at least speaks up
KY-Clay
2017-05-28 16:30:02 UTC
No way. She is a corrupt, lying, political hack.
?
2017-05-28 14:42:22 UTC
Not necessarily, but she wouldn't be embarrassing us.
Who
2017-05-28 13:23:42 UTC
my money was on homer simpson - he would have been better than either (with bart simpson as vp that would have been an awesome combination)
T'rone
2017-05-28 12:56:07 UTC
No, not at all. It would have been ANOTHER four years of deifying islam, blacks, illegals, transexuals and criminals not to mention, war with Russia.
Phyllis S
2017-05-27 23:19:09 UTC
absolutely not
?
2017-05-27 23:12:04 UTC
Better in some ways, worse in others.
Really
2017-05-27 19:46:52 UTC
Is this a serious question? We narrowly avoided the end of this world as we know it. Our way of life would have already been gone. I would take Borats retarded brother Billow over Hillary. She's lost the election despite all her attempts to steal it. Now that demon will leave her body, and she will fall dead. Then she's all theirs.
carter
2017-05-27 18:57:53 UTC
Not really. A second Watergate would be happening right now, although the same may happen regarding Trump.
matt
2017-05-27 18:55:28 UTC
No absolutely not. I'm not a blind Trump supporter and I don't agree with him on all issue or all things he's done to this point. I still however stand by my vote for him 100% and in no way ever want Hillary Clinton as president.
papabear
2017-05-27 18:12:53 UTC
really
shirin
2017-05-27 18:00:37 UTC
yes
?
2017-05-27 15:21:29 UTC
I agree. Hillary has more experience in politics.
2017-05-27 11:40:47 UTC
Not in a million years.



.
Mike
2017-05-27 04:46:42 UTC
Hillary today compared Trump to Nixon stating that Nixon was charged with obstructing justice. FACT CHECK: Nixon was never charged with that crime, although her husband, Bill Clinton, WAS charged with it at his impeachment.
2017-05-27 04:13:26 UTC
Himmlery is all about power over the People. Himmlery is the most corrupt politician ever. America saved the future of her grandchildren when we elected Trump in 2016. You liberal snowflake ash-holes are beyond stupid in how you believe the useless liberal media's telling of Trump's success. Trump has been very successful with respect to following the Constitution. The problem is that you'll never hear that on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, MSNBC or any of the liberal, big-city newspapers. Trump is keeping his campaign promises. The liberals are doing everything they can to keep that truth from you.
2017-05-27 02:21:53 UTC
qwefqwefqwef
?
2017-05-26 16:28:50 UTC
Hillary would have given a feeling of normalcy to the American citizens because she was a politician well-known in Washington and around the world. The Democrats are being radicalized, and some Republicans are defecting, because of Trump's being a fish out of water in politics.
tribeca_belle
2017-05-26 16:19:39 UTC
Without a doubt. I expected Trump to be bad but this is beyond anything that I could have imagined. We have never seen such corruption and incompetence ever in a US presidency.



The possibility of collusion with a foreign government that has been shown to have interfered in our presidential election is behavior beyond anything that any reasonable person could have imagined.
2017-05-26 16:12:06 UTC
I don't agree. While Trump so far appears to be a train wreck, I do not have the sense that Clinton would have been "far better".
Paddle Dude
2017-05-27 19:40:10 UTC
No, they are both horrible human beings. That is why they had a campaign against her called:



"Citizens United Not Timid" aka C.U.N.T
?
2017-05-27 19:31:25 UTC
Hillary Clinton would have been a far better president than Donald Trump if it wasn't for the Russian interference of the 2016 US general election.
2017-05-27 18:48:58 UTC
A woman who was going to NUKE the Russians AND BRING US INTO THE THIRD WORLD WAR...better than someone who wasn't? I think not



And BTW, I'm not a "Trump supporter" but I voted for him...you know why



I was one of plenty factory workers who was left out of a job because of closure, Due to Obama's bad handling of the economy I was out of a job.



When we had our meetings at our union halls....



Guess who showed up...



Bernie Sanders showed up

Donald Trump showed up

Even Jill Stein and Gary Johnson showed up



Did ******* HILLARY SHOW UP TO ADDRESS OUR CONCERNS....



NOPE



I was originally supporting Sanders, but after he got SCREWED, I changed to Trump, because at least he had the common decency to show up to our meetings (we even held a meeting when Hillary was in town, and she didn't even have the common decency to show up, which proves she diD NOT give a RAT'S ******* *** ABOUT THE GRASS ROOTS WORKER.
?
2017-05-27 17:37:52 UTC
Yes. Because Bill was there to advise her. I don't know why people never thought of that.
Nikhil
2017-05-27 15:32:16 UTC
It differs on different humans by their way of thinking and so on. But according to me no
?
2017-05-27 12:58:12 UTC
NO
RICK
2017-05-26 17:52:37 UTC
Nope

However the bag lady on the corner would be better then either of them


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...