Meh. When its just as easy to purchase a non-drop side crib, or get the free screws to make it one, I really don't see why you'd fight so hard for the right to keep it as a safety hazard? Babies -have- died, some have had close calls. I dont really understand what makes you think your baby is the exception. Its not like those other babies who have gotten hurt purposely put themselves in those positions. Besides, Im a pretty short person myself who initially had worries about reaching my infant with the immobile sides but it was NOT an issue.
The invincibility argument is not a real argument. Drop side cribs can be dangerous, but that would never happen to My baby. My baby would never get stuck. My baby would never get hurt without my nothing. Uh, yeah, it could. That's the whole reason why drop down cribs have gotten recalled nationally (globally?)
Its like arguing over not putting sharp knives away, or refusing to buy medicine with the child proof caps. The chances of your child actually finding these things, and hurting themselves? Pretty low. But its happened and avoiding it is a simple, easy step away. Drop side cribs seem like the same situation to me.
"I had a friend years ago lose her nephew to window blinds, but do moms jump all over..."
No, but that would be why there are hazard warnings on the blinds, on the box the blinds come in, why you can purchase hooks to screw into walls to tie up loose strings, why the dangerous are mentioned on places like parenting boards/prenatal books, and why even people like your house inspector will mention such hazards.
When its easy to avoid the possible hazard, what reason do you have not to do it? That's my question.
All-in-all, I do not care what you do in your own home. But if you want to make an argument about it, It just seems ignorant (to me) to preach to have the right to use (proven to be) dangerous goods for your kids.
Should other parents jump all over you? Well, No. But their over-zealous behaviour doesn't make your argument sound either